Another story from the Metro. On Monday they reported that Britney Spears recordings are
being used as a weapon to scare off Somali pirates. Merchant navy officer
Rachel Owens, who works on supertankers operating off the east coast of Africa,
is reported as saying, ‘these guys can’t stand Western culture or music . . .
as soon as the pirates get a blast of Britney, they move on as quickly as they
can’.
I’m
intrigued by these tales of musical counter-terrorism: elsewhere it has been
reported that Metallica’s ‘Enter Sandman’ has been used as a form of torture in
Gauntanamo Bay, while Transport for London regularly uses classical music to
ward of loitering kids at its more ‘urban’ underground stations. Whose taste is
really being exposed here: the terrorists or those who are trying to combat
them? Owens appears to be as anti-Britney as she is anti-Somali pirate, and
elsewhere in the Metro article Steven
Jones of the Security Association for the Maritime Industry is quoted as saying
‘I’d imagine using Justin Bieber would be against the Geneva Convention’. Surely
it is the relentlessness and loudness of the musical exposure, as much as it is
the artist in question, that is the cause of annoyance to the victim. And so
are the DJs of these tracks just having some harmless fun, or are we witnessing
the terror of cultural capital in action?
No comments:
Post a Comment