One way to tell the history of rock ‘n’ roll is to look at changing
profit margins. Musicians follow the money.
Jason Toynbee has argued that
popular music is characterised by a high degree of ‘institutional autonomy’.
Artists have freedom from capitalist jurisdiction. Toynbee believes that the
music industries 'cede control of production (writing, performing, realizing)
to musicians themselves’. I think he’s mostly right. Although popular music ‘belongs
to capitalism’, popular musicians are not entirely in thrall to their employers.
One of the reasons for this is because musicians' jobs are diffuse:
they write, they perform and they realize. Importantly, their employers in each
of these fields are different: artists sign separate publishing deals, record
deals and live performance contracts. They have further areas of activity that
escape totalising control. Even the 360˚ deal is not all encompassing.
History enters
this matrix because the profit margins for each of these activities change and
artists change direction accordingly. At present, for some, it is live music
that is most economically rewarding. These performers are now making records to
promote their tours, rather than the other way round. Publishing income has
often outstripped recording income. It is this economic imperative, as much as
an aesthetic urge, that had led many performers to become writers.
Musicians
are also subject to profit margins in the wider economy. There is money in live
music for heritage acts and global superstars. At a grassroots level, however,
the live music scene is struggling. In the UK many venues are closing. Upcoming
artists are getting paid less for their performances. Sometimes they get paid nothing at all.
One of the
factors in play here is the profit margin on a pint of beer. This was greater
in the past. Hence pubs and clubs could afford to give more money to live performers.
They also wanted music because noise sells beer. As profits on alcohol have declined,
bars have sought other ways of making money. One of these has been via food, on
which the profit margins are high. The changing pub economy has not been great
for performers, particularly loud or left-field ones, as noisy popular music does
not go always go down well with a meal. The gastro-pub arrived in the 1990s, at
which point cookery was being described as ‘the new rock ‘n’ roll’. It was also killing the old one.
No comments:
Post a Comment