I have just returned from Campinas in Brazil, where I was
attending the 18th biennial conference of the International
Association for the Study of Popular Music (IASPM). I heard some great papers
there, covering a wide range of subjects (from Astrid Gliberto to Metallica,
from modernism to the Musicians’ Union). I also gave my own paper, ‘Sounds Revolting’, which was drawn largely from my recent blog entries about big data
and new music. I introduced it by asking the delegates if they knew the current
number one single, either in the UK, the US or Brazil. The fact that I didn’t
receive a single correct reply confirmed my thesis and is a reflection of
the lack of centrality that the charts play in people’s lives. Or is it just
indicative of IASPM? One of the curious things about the international
association of popular music is that it doesn't pay much attention to the most popular popular music. I attended plenty
of talks, but none of the papers addressed music that is currently in the
charts.
While I was
at the conference I met with Olivier Julien, who lectures in music at the
Sorbonne. He has recently written a great review of my book in the French
journal Volume, in which he describes
its structure as a ‘truly brilliant idea’. He sums up:
Given this clever and engaging
formal scheme, and considering it helps organize an argument that is
particularly well researched and documented while providing an overall pleasant
and stimulating reading experience, I believe Osborne’s book to be one of the
best recent contributions to what Amanda Bayley described, back in 2009, as “the
increasingly diverse research currently being undertaken in the field of
recorded music” (2009: 2). For these reasons, I am certain Vinyl: A History of the Analogue Record will soon feature
prominently on many bookshelves, alongside such classics as Andre Millard’s America on Record (1995) or Mark Katz’s Capturing Sound (2004).
No comments:
Post a Comment