Amanda Palmer is one of the artists to have
suffered from record company equations (see my previous post on sound recording
copyright). In her famous TED talk she spoke of her previous record company
‘walking off’ because her album only sold 25,000 copies, a figure that was
inadequate to cover its costs. She went on to prove that you don’t need to have
a vast audience in order to be profitable. A later project was financed by the
donations of fans: they were requested to provide funds for a recording and in
return they would get a copy of the album when it was complete. Palmer managed
to raise $1,192,793 using this method, constituting ‘the biggest music
crowd-funding project to date’. The money came from just 24,883 fans, roughly
the same number that had led to her being dropped.
Palmer learnt
from the record industry: she profited from failure. This is not only because she
managed to raise over $1m. If we return to sound recording copyright laws, you
will remember that ownership is given to those who paid for the recording. In Palmer’s case this should mean that her
24,883 fans don’t just own physical or digital copies of her album, they should
have a share of its sound recording copyright too. That’s not the case,
however. It belongs to 8ft Records, a company that Amanda Palmer owns. Is she beating
the record companies at their own game, or has she been beaten by that game?
It’s certainly the case that as well as promoting a new business model she has
perpetuated an old one. The walls come tumbling up.
No comments:
Post a Comment